“All the people like us are We, and everyone else is They. ”
~ Rudyard Kipling
Somehow over the years, “agenda” has become a buzzword buried in negative connotations – “the liberal agenda” or “the conservative agenda” or “the homosexual agenda” or “the fundamentalist agenda.” We tend to shy away from any accusation that we personally may have an agenda, or that the group we represent (or are ideologically in alignment with) has an agenda. It’s a dirty word.
It is also an accurate word. Everyone has an agenda. Look at the definition according to Oxford Dictionary:
If you cannot accept that, then perhaps this site – and this debate – is not for you. If you did not have an agenda, you would not voice your opinion one way or the other… there would be no point, no motive for you to do so. Maybe you think we should maintain the status quo, maybe you think sweeping changes are needed, maybe you fall somewhere in between… regardless, we voice our opinions so that they will be considered by others.
My agenda, is fairly simple… I desire to see civil marriage equality for consenting adults, regardless of the gender of those seeking to be married. With that said, my agenda also involves achieving that result as ‘painlessly’ as possible for our nation and its citizens. I actually believe in the general goodness of most people. I think the majority of my fellow citizens are rational, intelligent beings who are capable of hearing – and debating – a well-reasoned argument. I do not believe that most of our citizens will need to be dragged, kicking and screaming, into accepting civil marriage equality. I do believe that many of our citizens have been driven away from considering it, by fear… not just by fear tactics employed by marriage equality opponents, but by fear of the unknown in general. So a part of my agenda involves using this site to reach those people, to talk with them, to hear their concerns and offer accurate information in return.
We all have an agenda… and now you know mine.
Religious Texts: This site is predominantly about marriage equality within the United States. Our Constitution does not permit for the establishment of a state religion. We are a nation of multiple beliefs tied to many different religious texts. Since no one religious text can hold dominance over any other in matters of law in the United States, they cannot legally be used as the basis of legislation here. It is perfectly fine to say that you believe gay marriage and homosexuality is right or wrong because the Bible/Koran/The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster says so… but since the citizens of our nation are not compelled by law to recognize the authority of your particular religious text, such arguments are specious at best. Now, before you go wandering off in a huff, consider this: would you be swayed by an argument against something you devoutly believe in if the source were another religion’s holy book? Could I use the Koran to convince you that husbands have the right to beat their wives? Could I use the Christian Bible to convince you that wearing a hijab is silly?
Non-peer Reviewed Studies: If you don’t know what this means, Google is your friend. “Peer” means organizations like the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, the American Medical Association, the American Dental Association, etc. or their international equivalents. It does not mean 10 fundamentalist or liberal think-tanks backing each other up.
If your argument relies on either of those sources, you should feel confident that at the close of any discussion you have participated in, you will have “lost” the debate – even if no one bothers to refute you since, on both sides of the issues, many of us have likely refuted that same tired source a thousand times before.
We are never so blind...as when we look in the mirror. Learn More